SellingBrew

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your sales operation more effective.

Beware of False Signals in Sales Analysis

We’ve fielded countless subscriber questions about generating more credible and defensible findings from sales analysis. Specifically, many of the questions are talking about what we commonly refer to as “false signals.”

Here’s an example…

As part of their effort to optimize their sales pipeline, one Sales Ops team analyzed close-rates by sales rep. By comparing the closing ratios of individual salespeople and digging into the top performers, they were hoping to discover some more effective approaches that could be propagated across the rest of the sales team.

So far, so good. Better than good, in fact…this is great! This is exactly the type of diagnostic approach we advocate for figuring out what’s really working and doing more of it.

But here’s the rub…

When the team took their findings to management, they got shot down. Sales management was quick to dismiss the close-rate performance differences as being “mix related.” In other words, management claimed that the mix of opportunities that each sales rep was dealing with was so varied that radically different close-rates were to be expected.

And in this case, sales management was absolutely correct. The analysts had generated a false signal because they had neglected to properly segment the opportunities in their analysis. In effect, they were comparing apples to oranges. And as a result, their findings were easily discredited and dismissed.

As effective sales analysis is largely a comparative process, proper segmentation is crucial to ensure that you’re always comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges.

When making these types of comparisons, you always need to be asking, “Can we reasonably expect performance to be similar under these circumstances?” If the answer is no, then you need to apply additional segmentation attributes or data-filters to get to an apples-to-apples comparative basis.

Of course, you’ll still need to defend your findings at the end of the day. That dynamic won’t change. But with proper segmentation underlying your analysis, your findings will be much more accurate, far more credible, and a lot more difficult to dismiss.

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The SellingBrew Playbook

Related Resources

  • Tales from the Trenches in Sales Ops

    Driving sales effectiveness and efficiency at-scale can be messy. In this on-demand webinar, glean insights from seven cautionary case studies so you don't repeat the same mistakes and miscalculations.

    View This Webinar
  • Being An Internal Sales Consultant

    For sales operations functions, frustration and conflict would seem to be inevitable. But learn how an "internal consultant" mindset and approach can make driving improvements much easier...and far less frustrating.

    View This Webinar
  • Developing Better Forecasts

    In this on-demand webinar, learn about the seven major ways in which leading teams are approaching sales forecasting very differently to boost speed, accuracy, and overall performance and results.

    View This Webinar
  • Earning Sales Ops a Seat At the Table

    In this session, learn how leading teams have bridged the gap between just executing the plans that are handed down by others and actually having a hand in developing those plans in the first place.

    View This Webinar